| From: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage |
| Date: | 2012-01-27 15:48:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20120127154811.GC4107@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:35:04AM -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> > - The meaning of PGresAttValue is changed. The field 'value' now
> > contains a value withOUT terminating zero. This change seems to
> > have no effect on any other portion within the whole source
> > tree of postgresql from what I've seen.
>
> This is a minor point of concern. This function was exposed to
> support libpqtypes (which your stuff compliments very nicely by the
> way) and I quickly confirmed removal of the null terminator didn't
> cause any problems there. I doubt anyone else is inspecting the
> structure directly (also searched the archives and didn't find
> anything).
>
> This needs to be advertised very loudly in the docs -- I understand
> why this was done but it's a pretty big change in the way the api
> works.
Note that the non-NUL-terminated PGresAttValue is only used for row
handler. So no existing usage is affected.
But I agree using same struct in different situations is confusing,
thus the request for separate struct for row handler usage.
--
marko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-01-27 15:57:41 | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |
| Previous Message | MauMau | 2012-01-27 15:45:19 | Unreliable "pg_ctl -w start" again |