Re: libpq heartbeat

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>
Cc: Marcin Giedz <marcin(dot)giedz(at)arise(dot)pl>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq heartbeat
Date: 2016-10-27 16:10:50
Message-ID: CAHyXU0w8J7H_vAL7=9bZHwa=AKntsZvqWB3aQT4H+4VQwDAsaQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Francisco Olarte
<folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> wrote:
> And I'd like to point libpq sessions does not sound to be the best
> kind of traffic across a firewall, not a good service / protocol to
> expose.

meh -- it's perfectly fine to expose postgres to the internet as long
as you've handled the security concerns. This could be over ssh
tunnel for example.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Olarte 2016-10-27 16:18:19 Re: libpq heartbeat
Previous Message Jaime Rivera 2016-10-27 15:57:19 Escape variable