Re: libpq heartbeat

From: Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>
To: Marcin Giedz <marcin(dot)giedz(at)arise(dot)pl>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq heartbeat
Date: 2016-10-27 15:01:09
Message-ID: CA+bJJbyGhyJzb619C5Htg12hCcs8igj7SeyoMo9hjDVuOCOGHA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Marcin:

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Marcin Giedz <marcin(dot)giedz(at)arise(dot)pl> wrote:
> I'm wondering if there is any natural implementation of heartbeats in libpq
> library? We've been facing specially in firewall env occasionally session
> drops between client and server. Extending session timeout directly on
> firewalls is not possible (company rules). Perhaps there is such mechanism
> "somewhere" to avoid reimplementation ?

RTFM? Now, seriously. Have you read
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/libpq-connect.html#LIBPQ-PARAMKEYWORDS,
specifically search for keepalive. Keepalives generate traffic which
normally keeps overzealous firewalls happy, I have used it before
successfully.

And I'd like to point libpq sessions does not sound to be the best
kind of traffic across a firewall, not a good service / protocol to
expose.

Francisco Olarte.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melvin Davidson 2016-10-27 15:03:43 Re: Remove Standby (SLAVE) from Primary (MASTER) - Postgres9.1
Previous Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2016-10-27 15:01:05 Re: libpq heartbeat