From: | Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding a '--two-phase' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility. |
Date: | 2024-12-12 07:57:10 |
Message-ID: | CAHv8RjJc6CeiNSimvChjPRf-R2S1=mpm3AhYHeWy8Js9XdzHcg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 8:14 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Dear Shubham,
>
> > Thank you for pointing this out and for suggesting the changes. I
> > agree with your approach.
> > Also, I found a mistake in getopt_long and fixed it in this version of
> > the patch.
> > The attached patch contains the suggested changes.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch. I think the patch looks mostly OK.
>
> Regarding the test code - I think we should directly refer the pg_subscription catalog,
> and confirm that subtwophase is 'p'. IIUC, we can wait until
> all subscriptions. Subtwophasestate are 'e', by using poll_query_until() and [1].
>
> [1]: SELECT count(1) = 0 FROM pg_subscription WHERE subtwophasestate NOT IN ('e');
>
I have fixed the given comment. The v5 version patch attached at [1]
has the changes for the same.
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHv8Rj%2Bhd2MTNRs4AsK6%3DhRqvV6JC9g2tTAJwGjrNfXg6vhD8g%40mail.gmail.com
Thanks and Regards,
Shubham Khanna.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shubham Khanna | 2024-12-12 07:57:41 | Re: Adding a '--two-phase' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility. |
Previous Message | Shubham Khanna | 2024-12-12 07:55:43 | Re: Adding a '--two-phase' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility. |