Re: Adding a '--two-phase' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility.

From: Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding a '--two-phase' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility.
Date: 2024-12-10 11:49:33
Message-ID: CAHv8Rj+ZP8xFp9vxqQVy0ciJiVmnJDBXnHwBOyY1EdZh5o=HKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 7:42 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Dear Shubham,
>
> Thanks for the proposal!
>
> > I am writing to propose the addition of the two_phase option in
> > pg_createsubscriber. As discussed in [1], supporting this feature
> > during the development of pg_createsubscriber was planned for this
> > version.
>
> Yes, that was the pending item.
>
> > The attached patch has the changes for the same.
>
> There are API related comments.
>
> 01.
> I think the two-phase should be off by default. Because default value for CREATE
> SUBSCRIPTION command is off, and your patch breaks pre-existing style.
>
> 02.
> API style should be changed: no need to require the argument. I think it is enough
> to provide "enable-twophase" and "T" option which specify the two_phase to true.
>

I have fixed the given comments. The v2 version patch attached at [1]
has the changes for the same.
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHv8RjLcdmz%3D_RMwveuDdr8i7r%3D09TAwtOnFmXeaia_v2RmnYA%40mail.gmail.com

Thanks and Regards,
Shubham Khanna.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nisha Moond 2024-12-10 11:51:09 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Previous Message Amul Sul 2024-12-10 11:47:25 Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature