From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Disallow UPDATE/DELETE on table with unpublished generated column as REPLICA IDENTITY |
Date: | 2024-12-05 21:14:28 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PvgAmnxwBTd0sMv7aJort-o5zdPPAer2KwSiF+E0QLP5w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 8:49 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 9:32 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 2:41 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 7:34 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > IIUC, these errors are intended for when there is *any* unpublished
> > > > generated column found in the RI, and the RI might also have other
> > > > columns in it generated or otherwise. So, I think those error messages
> > > > saying "consists of" should be reworded like below, or similar:
> > > > * errdetail("Replica identity includes an unpublished generated column.")));
> > > > * errdetail("Replica identity has one or more unpublished generated
> > > > columns.")));
> > > > * errdetail("One or more unpublished generated columns are in the
> > > > Replica identity.")));
> > > > * ...
> > > >
> > >
> > > How about a bit clearer: "Replica identity must not contain any
> > > unpublished generated column."?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, that is better.
> >
> > Compare:
> > Replica identity contains unpublished generated columns.
> > Replica identity must not contain unpublished generated columns.
> >
> > Maybe it is just my imagination, but the "must not" version feels more
> > like it implies the Replica Identify is in the wrong, whereas I think
> > it is most likely that the Replica Identity is correct, and the real
> > problem is that the user just forgot to publish the generated column.
> >
>
> Either way is possible and I find the message "Replica identity must
> not contain unpublished generated columns." clearer as compared to the
> other option.
>
OK, let's go with that.
======
Kind Regards
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo Nagata | 2024-12-05 21:25:49 | Assert failure on running a completed portal again |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-12-05 20:39:05 | Re: deferred writing of two-phase state files adds fragility |