Re: pg_createsubscriber: publication-name and subscription-name options do not exist

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, christophe(dot)courtois(at)dalibo(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_createsubscriber: publication-name and subscription-name options do not exist
Date: 2024-12-03 04:54:48
Message-ID: CAHut+Pun35SKMabQ8hF=M=Dq108qM64Uk-W2=nos8WB_JgT7hg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Hi Shubham,

The patch v5-0001 looks mostly OK to me (visual inspection only).

But, I did notice one other improvement you could make in passing.

1.
- TABLES</literal></link>. If <option>publication-name</option> option is
- not specified, it has the following name pattern:
+ TABLES</literal></link>. If <option>--publication</option> is not
+ specified, it has the following name pattern:

Instead of saying "it has the following name pattern:", IMO it is better to say:
"the publication has the following name pattern:".

That would make it consistent with the similar sentences which are saying:
"... the replication slot has the following name pattern:
"... the subscription has the following name pattern:"

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shubham Khanna 2024-12-03 05:11:36 Re: pg_createsubscriber: publication-name and subscription-name options do not exist
Previous Message Shubham Khanna 2024-12-03 04:22:25 Re: pg_createsubscriber: publication-name and subscription-name options do not exist