From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions |
Date: | 2021-04-08 03:04:27 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PuVe2YEWwhjOd1u8Ee_CEvrFkvYV87LwFdieoz+V+Tm8w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 3:49 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:11 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > 3.
> > There is inconsistent wording for what seems to be the same condition.
> > e.g.1 The existing documentation [2] says "Xid of the transaction. The
> > XID is sent only when user has requested streaming of in-progress
> > transactions."
> > e.g.2 For a similar case the patch says "Xid of the transaction (only
> > present for streamed transactions)."
> > I think there should be consistent wording used on this page where possible.
> >
>
> I think this is already modified as below in the patch. Is there any
> other place you are referring to?
No. My mistake. Sorry for the false alarm.
------
KInd Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-04-08 03:12:46 | Re: Extensions not dumped when --schema is used |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-04-08 02:56:37 | Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions |