From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions |
Date: | 2021-04-08 02:56:37 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Lgg_FWak_9yyeF0Ovn28pA4x0QyoDHWWga9p2e7udSCw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 3:49 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:11 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 3.
> There is inconsistent wording for what seems to be the same condition.
> e.g.1 The existing documentation [2] says "Xid of the transaction. The
> XID is sent only when user has requested streaming of in-progress
> transactions."
> e.g.2 For a similar case the patch says "Xid of the transaction (only
> present for streamed transactions)."
> I think there should be consistent wording used on this page where possible.
>
I think this is already modified as below in the patch. Is there any
other place you are referring to?
@@ -6457,8 +6462,7 @@ Message
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
- Xid of the transaction. The XID is sent only when user has
- requested streaming of in-progress transactions.
+ Xid of the transaction (only present for streamed
transactions).
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2021-04-08 03:04:27 | Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-04-08 02:44:15 | Re: TRUNCATE on foreign table |