Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions
Date: 2021-04-08 02:56:37
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Lgg_FWak_9yyeF0Ovn28pA4x0QyoDHWWga9p2e7udSCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 3:49 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:11 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 3.
> There is inconsistent wording for what seems to be the same condition.
> e.g.1 The existing documentation [2] says "Xid of the transaction. The
> XID is sent only when user has requested streaming of in-progress
> transactions."
> e.g.2 For a similar case the patch says "Xid of the transaction (only
> present for streamed transactions)."
> I think there should be consistent wording used on this page where possible.
>

I think this is already modified as below in the patch. Is there any
other place you are referring to?

@@ -6457,8 +6462,7 @@ Message
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
- Xid of the transaction. The XID is sent only when user has
- requested streaming of in-progress transactions.
+ Xid of the transaction (only present for streamed
transactions).

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2021-04-08 03:04:27 Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2021-04-08 02:44:15 Re: TRUNCATE on foreign table