Re: GUC names in messages

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC names in messages
Date: 2024-09-10 07:11:13
Message-ID: CAHut+Ptm+DOdTLJ0oMiWurAaqohst1xt5aE0aBXCF2NPY_ehZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 3:54 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
...
> 0001 and 0004 have been applied with these tweaks. I am still not
> sure about the changes for DateStyle and IntervalStyle in 0002 and
> 0003. Perhaps others have an opinion that could drive to a consensus.
>

Thanks for pushing the patches 0001 and 0004.

I have rebased the two remaining patches. See v12 attached.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v12-0002-GUC-names-fix-case-datestyle.patch application/octet-stream 11.2 KB
v12-0001-GUC-names-fix-case-intervalstyle.patch application/octet-stream 1.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Banck 2024-09-10 07:11:19 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Previous Message shveta malik 2024-09-10 06:44:55 Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication