From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: DOCS - inactive_since field readability |
Date: | 2025-02-16 20:35:46 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PtHzdJhRWiHv7e-mbjCoYbGrXa8Y+kP5CG_aLbgZN-8Jg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
...
>
> No, I meant to say that the description didn't looked any better to me
> even after your 0001 patch. The second paragraph started immediately
> in the next line which doesn't make it look any better. If we really
> want to make it look better then one more additional line is required.
> However, I don't want to go in that direction unless we have some
> history of writing the docs similarly. I suggest let's go with your
> 0002 patch as that makes the description concise and clear.
>
OK. My blank lines patch has been abandoned. Here is just the
'inactive_since' description patch (now called 0001).
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-DOCS-improve-pg_replication_slots.inactive_since-.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-02-16 20:55:10 | Re: BackgroundPsql swallowing errors on windows |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2025-02-16 18:47:40 | Re: BackgroundPsql swallowing errors on windows |