Re: DOCS - inactive_since field readability

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 2:06 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> ...
> >
> > No, I meant to say that the description didn't looked any better to me
> > even after your 0001 patch. The second paragraph started immediately
> > in the next line which doesn't make it look any better. If we really
> > want to make it look better then one more additional line is required.
> > However, I don't want to go in that direction unless we have some
> > history of writing the docs similarly. I suggest let's go with your
> > 0002 patch as that makes the description concise and clear.
> >
>
> OK. My blank lines patch has been abandoned. Here is just the
> 'inactive_since' description patch (now called 0001).
>

Looks good to me. I'll push this tomorrow unless there are any further
comments/suggestions.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.