| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together. |
| Date: | 2022-07-29 09:51:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PsYPJuYe-VD6-6tAvb8OvF83PSPC1ULwFn45W5oiKHKwg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 7:36 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 2022-Jul-29, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> > PSA v2 of this patch, modified as suggested.
>
> I don't object to doing this, but I think these two functions should
> stay together nonetheless.
Hmm, I think there is some confusion because different people have
mentioned multiple functions.
AFAIK, the patch *does* ensure the 2 functions (is_publishable_class
and is_publishable_relation) stay together.
If you believe there is still a problem after applying the patch
please explicitly name what function(s) you think should be moved.
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-07-29 09:59:00 | Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together. |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-07-29 09:36:33 | Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits |