Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?

From: Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?
Date: 2013-04-29 12:01:25
Message-ID: CAHnozTg0VRHXUwa8diyCbh3Mc0n4Hr5ap3UNJab+DLNs2yN7VA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

thanks!
i also see that it's available from apt.postgresql.org, including lots of
postgres versions!

WBL

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:25:15PM +0200, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
> > I want to upgrade from londiste2 to londiste3.
> > Skytools 2 has a -modules- package.
> > We're using postgres 8.4 at the moment, so we use the package
> > skytools-modules-8.4.
> >
> > Now i'm looking at londiste3 in Debian experimental, but there are no
> > 'modules' packages. Don't i need one anymore?
> > (hope this is not off-topic for the list)
>
> It's renamed to postgresql-X.Y-pgq3.
>
> --
> marko
>
>

--
"Quality comes from focus and clarity of purpose" -- Mark Shuttleworth

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2013-04-29 14:23:48 Re: UPDATE using 3 medium-sized tables causes runaway hash table and fills disk
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2013-04-29 11:01:05 Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?