Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?

From: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?
Date: 2013-04-29 11:01:05
Message-ID: 20130429110105.GA4104@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:25:15PM +0200, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
> I want to upgrade from londiste2 to londiste3.
> Skytools 2 has a -modules- package.
> We're using postgres 8.4 at the moment, so we use the package
> skytools-modules-8.4.
>
> Now i'm looking at londiste3 in Debian experimental, but there are no
> 'modules' packages. Don't i need one anymore?
> (hope this is not off-topic for the list)

It's renamed to postgresql-X.Y-pgq3.

--
marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Willy-Bas Loos 2013-04-29 12:01:25 Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?
Previous Message Willy-Bas Loos 2013-04-29 10:25:15 don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?