Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()

From: Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tomasz Rybak <tomasz(dot)rybak(at)post(dot)pl>, "Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp" <Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)mitsubishielectric(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()
Date: 2024-06-14 03:02:43
Message-ID: CAHewXNk3Y3YQQ0J3bTG_-QyiEHs1gUJQCx-fQxUys-s8mzR25A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Robert,

Since this patch had been reviewed at PgConf.dev Patch Review
Workshop. And I have updated
the patch according to the review advice. Now there are no others to
comment this patch.
The status of this patch on commitfest have stayed "need review" for a long
time.
I want to know if it is ready to move to the next status "Ready for
commiter".

Thanks.

--
Tender Wang

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiro Ikeda 2024-06-14 03:52:59 Re: Doc: fix a description regarding WAL summarizer on glossary page
Previous Message Joseph Koshakow 2024-06-14 02:56:38 Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping