Re: log message from autovac doesn't include db name

From: gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Matheus de Oliveira <matioli(dot)matheus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
Subject: Re: log message from autovac doesn't include db name
Date: 2014-09-17 04:11:37
Message-ID: CAHRs-_chcovTvoQ3sHn3xg5FkRWgr1Pr4mO-0XQyYO-WQTovXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Sep 16, 2014 12:52 PM, "Matheus de Oliveira" <matioli(dot)matheus(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
wrote:
>>
>> gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > I'm running 9.1.11 on CentOS. I'm getting several messages like this
in my logs:
>> > 2014-09-12 01:44:25.583 PDT,,,30540,,4dbffb0c.7b5b,5,,2014-09-12
01:41:42 PDT,74/868,0,LOG,55P03,"skipping analyze of ""foo"" --- lock not
available",,,,,,
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, I have several databases with tables named 'foo'. I
was expecting a db name in the log message; can someone explain why it's
not there?
>>
>> Fix your log_line_prefix setting to include DB name and then HUP your
server.
>
>
> humm... This looks like CVS log, so the database name would be there if
it was a backend process, independent of log_line_prefix.

Yep, csv log - which is why I was expecting a db name :)

Although looks like this message came from autovacuum process, and so it
won't give you the database name.
>
> Perhaps it should have qualified as dbname.schemaname.tablename just like
"automatic vacuum" and "automatic analyze" messages do. One could do a
feature request for that.

Thanks! That's the info I was looking for.

gabrielle

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-09-17 20:40:44 Re: How to interpret view pg_stat_bgwriter
Previous Message Rajesh Madiwale 2014-09-17 04:00:28 Re: log message from autovac doesn't include db name