From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Huang, Suya" <Suya(dot)Huang(at)au(dot)experian(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to interpret view pg_stat_bgwriter |
Date: | 2014-09-17 20:40:44 |
Message-ID: | 5419F1CC.8060309@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 9/16/14 2:42 AM, Huang, Suya wrote:
> # checkpoints_req is much bigger than checkpoints_timed, suggest that I
> may increase checkpoint_segments in our system
That's not strictly necessary, but personally I think both of those
settings are too low for you.
> #maxwritten_clean is high, suggests increase bgwriter_lru_maxpages
Yes.
> # buffers_backend is much smaller than buffers_alloc, suggests
> increasing bgwriter_lru_maxpages, bgwriter_lru_multiplier, and
> decreasing bgwriter_delay.
You should rather compare buffers_backend against buffers_checkpoint.
Also consider graphing these quantities over time so you can see how
different workloads affects the results and what the effects of your
tuning are.
Also turn on log_checkpoints and look at the sync times. In my
experience that dominates all the bgwriter tuning.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajiv Kasera | 2014-09-18 04:01:51 | Archiving & Reporting Support in PG9.3 |
Previous Message | gabrielle | 2014-09-17 04:11:37 | Re: log message from autovac doesn't include db name |