Re: Problem with postgres_fdw and partitioned tables (9.6 to 10.2)

Just to follow-up, I think if this (importing a foreign Pg10 partitioned
table into Pg9.6 via FDW) is just one of those things that isn't allowed,
the DB should spit out a very clear error. Right it doesn't so it looks
like the command executed fine so I spend a lot of time trying to find out
what happened to that table.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us> wrote:

> My local DB is PG 9.6.6, remote is PG 10.2.
>
> I created a partitioned table on remote that I want to be able to run
> queries against from the local DB. I create the server and user mappings
> just fine. Then I run IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA ... LIMIT TO to bring that
> remote table into view on my local 9.6 table. The IMPORT statement doesn't
> return any errors, but I can't see the partitioned table.
>
> If I create a regular unpartitioned table on the remote 10.2 DB, I can
> import that just fine.
>
> I'm guessing this just a limitation of using the 9.6 DB to import 10.2
> features? Could I somehow create a view in 10.2 in front of that table to
> hide its true nature?
>
> Don.
>
> --
> Don Seiler
> www.seiler.us
>

--
Don Seiler
www.seiler.us