From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: docs: Improve documentation of \pset without arguments. |
Date: | 2014-08-11 03:14:22 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwHcqqznc2RN3RUX3Hw=fp0DDdwvQB2TJSbvZUq3bAv5tw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>> docs: Improve documentation of \pset without arguments.
>>>
>>> The syntax summary previously failed to clarify that the first
>>> argument is also optional. The textual description did mention it,
>>> but all the way at the bottom. It fits better with the command
>>> overview, so move it there, and fix the summary also.
>>
>> Is it better to back-patch this to 9.4? The first argument of
>> \pset command is optional also in 9.4.
>
> I didn't feel it necessary, but if you want to, it's OK with me.
Yes, I'm inclined to back-patch that. Because the current description
of the syntax of \pset in 9.4 is not correct.
>> This commit is in next CF with "Ready for Committer".
>> Probably it needs to be marked as "Committed".
>
> Done.
Thanks.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G Johnston | 2014-08-11 03:39:27 | Re: pgsql: Further cleanup of JSON-specific error messages. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-08-10 21:34:27 | Re: pgsql: docs: Improve documentation of \pset without arguments. |