From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: docs: Improve documentation of \pset without arguments. |
Date: | 2014-09-04 05:08:00 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwHZDUc2r2K3etkq59BmanhTinx5PxoYPuFOyOFVM1HNeA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>>> docs: Improve documentation of \pset without arguments.
>>>>
>>>> The syntax summary previously failed to clarify that the first
>>>> argument is also optional. The textual description did mention it,
>>>> but all the way at the bottom. It fits better with the command
>>>> overview, so move it there, and fix the summary also.
>>>
>>> Is it better to back-patch this to 9.4? The first argument of
>>> \pset command is optional also in 9.4.
>>
>> I didn't feel it necessary, but if you want to, it's OK with me.
>
> Yes, I'm inclined to back-patch that. Because the current description
> of the syntax of \pset in 9.4 is not correct.
Done.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-09-04 16:18:09 | pgsql: Update comment to reflect commit 1d41739e5a04b0e93304d24d864b6bf |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-09-04 05:07:17 | pgsql: docs: Improve documentation of \pset without arguments. |