| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ordering in guc.c vs. config.sgml vs. postgresql.sample.conf |
| Date: | 2016-04-25 05:07:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwHNXbYBFW+Lfjq_mBkVS182xFt=evM-jO4vrbib+ZNrGA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working on
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEzwMa9y+Bp4Fi4fE4hmPfZMjOZOmuLVtbHhPWtcujrmLg@mail.gmail.com
> I once more taken aback by the total lack of consistency between the
> three files in $subject. Some of the inconsistency of guc.c vs. the rest
> comes from having separate lists for different datatypes - hard to avoid
> - but even disregarding that, there seems to be little to no
> consistency.
>
> How about we try to order them the same?
+1, especially for the ordering in config.sgml vs. postgresql.conf.sample
because that consistency makes it easy for users to use them.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2016-04-25 06:54:40 | Re: postgres_fdw : Not able to update foreign table referring to a local table's view when use_remote_estimate = true |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2016-04-25 04:57:57 | Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency |