| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Clough <greg(at)gclough(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #13770: Extending recovery_min_apply_delay on Standby causes it to be unavailable for a while |
| Date: | 2016-03-03 14:42:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwEb53NWtWfNwYs4GZhTh7QntaT9G2vs0z9oW_MueAKWJw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Julien Rouhaud
> <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
>> I just reviewed the patch. It's pretty straightforward and works as
>> intended, so I mark it as ready for committer.
The patch looks good to me.
We should backpatch this? I'm tempted to do that
because it seems an oversight.
It's user-visible change of behavior, though.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2016-03-03 14:54:02 | Re: BUG #13770: Extending recovery_min_apply_delay on Standby causes it to be unavailable for a while |
| Previous Message | alexey.kuntsevich | 2016-03-03 08:24:27 | BUG #13998: Misleading error from pg_basebackup |