| From: | Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Clough <greg(at)gclough(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #13770: Extending recovery_min_apply_delay on Standby causes it to be unavailable for a while |
| Date: | 2016-03-03 14:54:02 |
| Message-ID: | 56D8500A.3060407@dalibo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 03/03/2016 15:42, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Julien Rouhaud
>> <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I just reviewed the patch. It's pretty straightforward and works as
>>> intended, so I mark it as ready for committer.
>
> The patch looks good to me.
>
> We should backpatch this? I'm tempted to do that
> because it seems an oversight.
> It's user-visible change of behavior, though.
>
The user-visible previous situation is to have a standby unavailable for
no good reason, so +1 for backpatching it.
> Regards,
>
--
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-03-03 17:35:18 | Re: BUG #13770: Extending recovery_min_apply_delay on Standby causes it to be unavailable for a while |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2016-03-03 14:42:25 | Re: BUG #13770: Extending recovery_min_apply_delay on Standby causes it to be unavailable for a while |