From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: brin_summarize_new_values error checking |
Date: | 2016-04-20 06:05:31 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwEPy8SZWJBpBaSPPLbLbKuOBKv35tLNctuWaqZTZ5ARPw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> In reviewing one of my patches[1], Fujii-san has pointed out that I
>> didn't include checks for being in recovery, or for working on another
>> backend's temporary index.
>>
>> I think that brin_summarize_new_values in 9.5.0 commits those same
>> sins. In its case, I don't think those are critical, as they just
>> result in getting less specific error messages that one might hope
>> for, rather than something worse like a panic.
>>
>> But still, we might want to address them.
>
> Agreed to add those checks.
Attached patch does this.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
add_error_checks_to_brin_summarize_new_values_v1.patch | text/x-patch | 1.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-04-20 07:16:37 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-04-20 05:45:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |