Re: Mark a reloption as indexterm

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:09 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:57:32PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Are you suggesting that it should show "index storage parameters" and
> > "table storage parameters"? I'm not sure about that myself ...
> > particularly considering that certain parameters might apply to some
> > index AMs and not others.
>
> Yes, that's exactly what I was suggesting: putting all the
> index-related parameters into an index bucket, without caring about
> the AM involved.

+1

While reading the doc for index reloptins, I found that there is
no information about the type for each index reloption in the doc.
Probably it's worth adding that information, like the doc for table
reloptions have.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao