On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:57:32PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Are you suggesting that it should show "index storage parameters" and
> "table storage parameters"? I'm not sure about that myself ...
> particularly considering that certain parameters might apply to some
> index AMs and not others.
Yes, that's exactly what I was suggesting: putting all the
index-related parameters into an index bucket, without caring about
the AM involved.
--
Michael