From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Emanuel Calvo <emanuel(dot)calvo(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS] |
Date: | 2014-03-24 12:51:07 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwE1TcWm1-4TyZKETa6sRc0YOZJ0BQ8TVDT2cJg46yP4GA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Emanuel Calvo
<emanuel(dot)calvo(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I realized that the output of the CREATE RULE has not a detailed
> output for the "events" parameter.
>
> But the question here is that I'm not sure which format follow:
>
> { INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE | SELECT}
>
> or
>
> INSERT
> UPDATE
> DELETE
> SELECT
> - --
>
>
> I attach a patch for each one.
Though I'm not sure the right policy of the format in synopsis, ISTM that
the following format is suitable in this case, i.e., if the value list
is very simple.
Patch attached.
SELECT | INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
add_events_on_create_rule_fujii.patch | text/x-patch | 805 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Tolley | 2014-03-24 15:17:26 | Minor docs patch for pg_basebackup |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-03-24 10:55:08 | Re: START_REPLICATION TIMELINE |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Swapnil Bhoite | 2014-03-24 13:08:38 | Command line argument for Server |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-03-24 11:59:08 | Re: Global flag |