Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:51:07PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Emanuel Calvo
> <emanuel(dot)calvo(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I realized that the output of the CREATE RULE has not a detailed
> > output for the "events" parameter.
> >
> > But the question here is that I'm not sure which format follow:
> >
> > { INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE | SELECT}
> >
> > or
> >
> > INSERT
> > UPDATE
> > DELETE
> > SELECT
> > - --
> >
> >
> > I attach a patch for each one.
>
> Though I'm not sure the right policy of the format in synopsis, ISTM that
> the following format is suitable in this case, i.e., if the value list
> is very simple.
> Patch attached.
>
> SELECT | INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE

Patch applied.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +