Re: Migration to Maven

If the build tool was Maven, I would use <scope>provided</scope> for OSGi.
I do not know how the ANT script for this project works. OSGi is required
for the building, but it is not required at runtime.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:

> Can you advice us how to make it optional? If we did not provided required
> files build errors occurred.
>
> We were able to build it, but we had to delete all source files, which
> required OSGi imports and edit build.xml. However I doubt this is
> appropriate solution.
>
> Pavel Kajaba.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Balázs Zsoldos" <balazs(dot)zsoldos(at)everit(dot)biz>
> To: "List" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 9:30:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] Migration to Maven
>
>
>
>
> OSGi has problematic licence
>
>
> All OSGi jars are licensed with Apache 2.0. Is it problematic?
>
>
>
>
> OSGi is an optional dependency for postgresql jdbc driver. It is only
> necessary if someone uses the driver within an OSGi container. I think it
> is hardly the case when someone wants to use it from a linux package
> management system. That means that osgi jars do not have to be on the
> classpath at runtime when monolith application is started. I do not know
> this Fedora solution, but isn't is possible to ignore this dependency in
> the Fedoray package management after building the jar?
>
> *Zsoldos Balázs*
> Rendszertervező | Software architect
>
>
> +36 70 594 9234 | balazs(dot)zsoldos(at)everit(dot)biz
>
> *EverIT Kft.*
> 1137 Budapest, Katona József utca 17. III. em. 2.
> http://www.everit.biz I info(at)everit(dot)biz
>
>
> Ezen üzenet és annak bármely csatolt anyaga bizalmas, jogi védelem alatt
> áll, a nyilvános közléstől védett. Az üzenetet kizárólag a címzett, illetve
> az általa meghatalmazottak használhatják fel. Ha Ön nem az üzenet
> címzettje, úgy kérjük, hogy telefonon, vagy e-mail-ben értesítse erről az
> üzenet küldőjét és törölje az üzenetet, valamint annak összes csatolt
> mellékletét a rendszeréből. Ha Ön nem az üzenet címzettje, abban az esetben
> tilos az üzenetet vagy annak bármely csatolt mellékletét lemásolnia,
> elmentenie, az üzenet tartalmát bárkivel közölnie vagy azzal visszaélnie.
>
>
> This message and any attachment are confidential and are legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
> to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete
> this message and any attachment from your system. Please note that any
> dissemination, distribution, copying or use of or reliance upon the
> information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone
> other than the recipient designated above by the sender is unauthorised and
> strictly prohibited.
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> <blockquote>
> We are trying to build RPM package for postgresql-JDBC.
>
> There is no SSPI and OSGi package in Fedora so we are unable to build it.
>
> SSPI is totally useless since it's just Windows thing. OSGi has
> problematic licence, but after doing some research it's not required to run
> postgresql-JDBC.
>
> We believe that it would be really great for Fedora (also other distros -
> lot of things depends on your great work) if We could manage to make these
> two components optional.
>
> After doing some research and talk with Java friends, there is a way how
> to make it optional during build time.
>
> Profiles - both ant and Maven has them, but in case of migrating to Maven,
> I think it would be waste of time to create patch for ant profile since it
> would just throw away.
>
> Let me know your thoughts about this.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Pavel Kajaba.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
> To: "Pavel Kajaba" <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>
> Cc: "List" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Pavel Raiskup" <
> praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 1:20:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] Migration to Maven
>
> On 26 November 2015 at 04:29, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to ask migration about build system from ant to maven.
> >
> > According to github (https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/322) there is
> > some work behind it.
> >
> > Anyway what do you think about creating profiles in ant/maven?
> >
>
> What problem are you trying to solve ?
>
> Our bigger problem is to figure out how to have JDK 1.6, 1.7, and 1.8 and
> ... all supported by one codebase
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
> www.postgresintl.com
>
>
> >
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
>
>
> </blockquote>
>