Re: Migration to Maven

So currently I would imagine you have had to remove some source files in
order to build it?
How do you build the driver today ?

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com

On 2 December 2015 at 04:20, Balázs Zsoldos <balazs(dot)zsoldos(at)everit(dot)biz>
wrote:

> If the build tool was Maven, I would use <scope>provided</scope> for OSGi.
> I do not know how the ANT script for this project works. OSGi is required
> for the building, but it is not required at runtime.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Can you advice us how to make it optional? If we did not provided
>> required files build errors occurred.
>>
>> We were able to build it, but we had to delete all source files, which
>> required OSGi imports and edit build.xml. However I doubt this is
>> appropriate solution.
>>
>> Pavel Kajaba.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> From: "Balázs Zsoldos" <balazs(dot)zsoldos(at)everit(dot)biz>
>> To: "List" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 9:30:16 AM
>> Subject: Re: [JDBC] Migration to Maven
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> OSGi has problematic licence
>>
>>
>> All OSGi jars are licensed with Apache 2.0. Is it problematic?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> OSGi is an optional dependency for postgresql jdbc driver. It is only
>> necessary if someone uses the driver within an OSGi container. I think it
>> is hardly the case when someone wants to use it from a linux package
>> management system. That means that osgi jars do not have to be on the
>> classpath at runtime when monolith application is started. I do not know
>> this Fedora solution, but isn't is possible to ignore this dependency in
>> the Fedoray package management after building the jar?
>>
>> *Zsoldos Balázs*
>> Rendszertervező | Software architect
>>
>>
>> +36 70 594 9234 | balazs(dot)zsoldos(at)everit(dot)biz
>>
>> *EverIT Kft.*
>> 1137 Budapest, Katona József utca 17. III. em. 2.
>> http://www.everit.biz I info(at)everit(dot)biz
>>
>>
>> Ezen üzenet és annak bármely csatolt anyaga bizalmas, jogi védelem alatt
>> áll, a nyilvános közléstől védett. Az üzenetet kizárólag a címzett,
>> illetve
>> az általa meghatalmazottak használhatják fel. Ha Ön nem az üzenet
>> címzettje, úgy kérjük, hogy telefonon, vagy e-mail-ben értesítse erről az
>> üzenet küldőjét és törölje az üzenetet, valamint annak összes csatolt
>> mellékletét a rendszeréből. Ha Ön nem az üzenet címzettje, abban az
>> esetben
>> tilos az üzenetet vagy annak bármely csatolt mellékletét lemásolnia,
>> elmentenie, az üzenet tartalmát bárkivel közölnie vagy azzal visszaélnie.
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are confidential and are legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
>> to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If you are
>> not
>> the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete
>> this message and any attachment from your system. Please note that any
>> dissemination, distribution, copying or use of or reliance upon the
>> information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone
>> other than the recipient designated above by the sender is unauthorised
>> and
>> strictly prohibited.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> <blockquote>
>> We are trying to build RPM package for postgresql-JDBC.
>>
>> There is no SSPI and OSGi package in Fedora so we are unable to build it.
>>
>> SSPI is totally useless since it's just Windows thing. OSGi has
>> problematic licence, but after doing some research it's not required to
>> run
>> postgresql-JDBC.
>>
>> We believe that it would be really great for Fedora (also other distros -
>> lot of things depends on your great work) if We could manage to make these
>> two components optional.
>>
>> After doing some research and talk with Java friends, there is a way how
>> to make it optional during build time.
>>
>> Profiles - both ant and Maven has them, but in case of migrating to Maven,
>> I think it would be waste of time to create patch for ant profile since it
>> would just throw away.
>>
>> Let me know your thoughts about this.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Pavel Kajaba.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
>> To: "Pavel Kajaba" <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>
>> Cc: "List" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Pavel Raiskup" <
>> praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 1:20:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: [JDBC] Migration to Maven
>>
>> On 26 November 2015 at 04:29, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I would like to ask migration about build system from ant to maven.
>> >
>> > According to github (https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/322) there
>> is
>> > some work behind it.
>> >
>> > Anyway what do you think about creating profiles in ant/maven?
>> >
>>
>> What problem are you trying to solve ?
>>
>> Our bigger problem is to figure out how to have JDK 1.6, 1.7, and 1.8 and
>> ... all supported by one codebase
>>
>> Dave Cramer
>>
>> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
>> www.postgresintl.com
>>
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>>
>>
>>
>> </blockquote>
>>
>
>