Re: Migration to Maven

>
> OSGi has problematic licence

All OSGi jars are licensed with Apache 2.0. Is it problematic?

OSGi is an optional dependency for postgresql jdbc driver. It is only
necessary if someone uses the driver within an OSGi container. I think it
is hardly the case when someone wants to use it from a linux package
management system. That means that osgi jars do not have to be on the
classpath at runtime when monolith application is started. I do not know
this Fedora solution, but isn't is possible to ignore this dependency in
the Fedoray package management after building the jar?

*Zsoldos Balázs*
Rendszertervező | Software architect

+36 70 594 9234 | balazs(dot)zsoldos(at)everit(dot)biz

*EverIT Kft.*
1137 Budapest, Katona József utca 17. III. em. 2.
http://www.everit.biz I info(at)everit(dot)biz

Ezen üzenet és annak bármely csatolt anyaga bizalmas, jogi védelem alatt
áll, a nyilvános közléstől védett. Az üzenetet kizárólag a címzett, illetve
az általa meghatalmazottak használhatják fel. Ha Ön nem az üzenet
címzettje, úgy kérjük, hogy telefonon, vagy e-mail-ben értesítse erről az
üzenet küldőjét és törölje az üzenetet, valamint annak összes csatolt
mellékletét a rendszeréből. Ha Ön nem az üzenet címzettje, abban az esetben
tilos az üzenetet vagy annak bármely csatolt mellékletét lemásolnia,
elmentenie, az üzenet tartalmát bárkivel közölnie vagy azzal visszaélnie.

This message and any attachment are confidential and are legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If you are not
the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete
this message and any attachment from your system. Please note that any
dissemination, distribution, copying or use of or reliance upon the
information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone
other than the recipient designated above by the sender is unauthorised and
strictly prohibited.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:

> We are trying to build RPM package for postgresql-JDBC.
>
> There is no SSPI and OSGi package in Fedora so we are unable to build it.
>
> SSPI is totally useless since it's just Windows thing. OSGi has
> problematic licence, but after doing some research it's not required to run
> postgresql-JDBC.
>
> We believe that it would be really great for Fedora (also other distros -
> lot of things depends on your great work) if We could manage to make these
> two components optional.
>
> After doing some research and talk with Java friends, there is a way how
> to make it optional during build time.
>
> Profiles - both ant and Maven has them, but in case of migrating to Maven,
> I think it would be waste of time to create patch for ant profile since it
> would just throw away.
>
> Let me know your thoughts about this.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Pavel Kajaba.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
> To: "Pavel Kajaba" <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>
> Cc: "List" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Pavel Raiskup" <
> praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 1:20:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] Migration to Maven
>
> On 26 November 2015 at 04:29, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to ask migration about build system from ant to maven.
> >
> > According to github (https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/322) there is
> > some work behind it.
> >
> > Anyway what do you think about creating profiles in ant/maven?
> >
>
> What problem are you trying to solve ?
>
> Our bigger problem is to figure out how to have JDK 1.6, 1.7, and 1.8 and
> ... all supported by one codebase
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
> www.postgresintl.com
>
>
> >
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>