From: | Chethana Kumar <chethana(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Strauch, Sheldon" <sstrauch(at)enova(dot)com>, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Eckhardt <reckhardt(at)pivotal(dot)io>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Tree view icon samples |
Date: | 2017-07-03 14:25:43 |
Message-ID: | CAH4-4WswpygK0J7sysGLcgDM+Kk3BejNFbxQT7sqmJAGq3cUww@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi Dave,
I have updated the icons "Conversions, Function and Function Trigger" as
per you suggestions.
I feel the curved shapes won't look clear in 16px measurement which is
happening with 'Conversions' icons'.
We might have to rework on 'Conversions', what do you say ?
Regards,
Chethana kumar
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Chethana Kumar <
> chethana(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> I am attaching the updated icons along with new icons added.
>>
>> Also I have tried to address the issues raised in our previous review -
>>
>> 1. Cast and Conversion: Eliminated the texty feel as you commented.
>>
>> Thought process: Basically cast means "Conversion between Data types" and
>> Conversion means "Conversion between character" so I have come up with box
>> shape concept where box means any "conversion of any data type or any
>> character type". Ultimately "Box" plays role of a variable.
>>
>
> For Conversion, how about we make it a triangle and circle instead of two
> squares?
>
>
>>
>>
>> 2. Primary and Foreign key: Updated as per the feedback and have come up
>> with one more concept with slight changes in it.
>>
>
> Cool. I like the double-key for Foreign Key.
>
>
>>
>> Supporting content for the concept:
>> As Primary key cannot be more than one but where as Foreign key can be
>> more than one so taking this as base point I have presented the icon so.
>>
>>
>> 3. Index, Function and Function Trigger : As of now I have kept it as
>> existing one only, I cannot be more innovative here where it mis-matches
>> with the user's mental model. I am still brainstorming on these icons.
>>
>
> For index, how about a tree, like the bottom one at
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/B_
> tree_insertion_example.png. Leave out the numbers of course.
>
> For function, something with { } in there?
>
> And for Trigger Function, a mashup of function and trigger?
>
>
>>
>> Note: I have listed out the list of icons which will be used in pgAdmin 4
>> and will be working on those icons only
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chethana kumar
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Friday, June 30, 2017, Strauch, Sheldon <sstrauch(at)enova(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dave et al,
>>>>
>>>> Might I suggest flipping the foreign key icon left for right? That way,
>>>> the key "points" to the left, back toward something pre-existing whilst the
>>>> primary key "points" to the right, forward towards something new?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I like that idea.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also, for me, the updated index icon loses its intuitiveness as it
>>>> suggests an ordinal list or an enumeration. I think the clue in the old
>>>> icon was the index tab at the top of the illustration.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah. Maybe something that looks like a diagram of a btree?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Finally, the new trigger icon suggests, to me, that one is trying to do
>>>> something with a document, maybe copying it. Whereas the old icon suggests
>>>> an action to be taken.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I see what you mean. I don't think the old one is any better though.
>>> Chethana; do you have any alternative ideas?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just my two cents...
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> - The Primary Key and Foreign Key icons should have more
>>>>> differentiation than just colour. Maybe add a 1 to Primary Key?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Did you get a list of the other icons that aren't on that sheet yet?
>>>>>
>>>>> - I'm not sure I like the Casts and Conversions icons (mis-spelt as
>>>>> Converts by the previous owner). The text on the makes them seem textual
>>>>> than graphical.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Chethana Kumar <
>>>>> chethana(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Team, Attachment was missing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Chethana Kumar <
>>>>>> chethana(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Team,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Below are the updates for TreeView Icons -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Fine tuned the icons - Database, Language, Primary and Foreign
>>>>>>> key, Unique Constraint
>>>>>>> 2. Designed new concept for - Casts and Converts, Trigger
>>>>>>> 3. Attached the color blind test result for "Primary and Foreign
>>>>>>> key", now I feel it is pretty evident to differentiate for blind user
>>>>>>> 4. Attached "thought_process.png" where I have explained the thought
>>>>>>> process for newly proposed icons (referred:www.postgresql.org)
>>>>>>> 5. Added little depth to all icons to provide the Afforance of Click
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Ashesh Vashi <
>>>>>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Chethana Kumar <
>>>>>>>> chethana(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Ashesh,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I tried to eliminate the colour blind issue which might occur with
>>>>>>>>> the primary & foregin key icons.
>>>>>>>>> But still I will use the app to test the colors, just let me know
>>>>>>>>> your opinion now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please do.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One more point: :-)
>>>>>>>> Icons for some nodes are missing here.
>>>>>>>> i.e. Partition table (introduced in 'Declarative Partition' patch),
>>>>>>>> Materialized View, etc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Thanks, Ashesh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Chethana kumar
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Ashesh Vashi <
>>>>>>>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 28, 2017 22:32, "Robert Eckhardt" <reckhardt(at)pivotal(dot)io>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I like them as well. The only comment I have is that the red icon
>>>>>>>>>> on disconnected DB and corrupted DB are difficult to make out. They are
>>>>>>>>>> clearly differentiable but the icon itself is unclear.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A colour blind person may not be able to differentiate the
>>>>>>>>>> primary & foreign key icons.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- Ashesh
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- Rob
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > On 28 Jun 2017, at 12:41, Chethana Kumar <
>>>>>>>>>>> chethana(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi Team,
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > I am coming up with some sample icons for Tree View Control.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > Thought process behind the concept -
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Included EDB color brand feel (gray and blue colors)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You mean pgAdmin colour brand :-). EDB is orange & black.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Eliminated the distraction of too many colors and provided
>>>>>>>>>>> consistency through the icons
>>>>>>>>>>> > 3. User will recognize the icon shapes rather than recalling
>>>>>>>>>>> it by their colors (like in existing icons) so focused more on shapes
>>>>>>>>>>> > 4. It also adds value to the brand since it has EDB color
>>>>>>>>>>> tones in it
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > So please feel free to share your views on the same
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I like them - they look much more modern and stylish, but still
>>>>>>>>>>> fit with what they represent.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Other opinions please?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Good work!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Chethana Kumar
>>>>>>>>> Principal UI/UX Designer
>>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Postgres Database Company
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> P: +91 86981 57146 <+91%2086981%2057146>
>>>>>>>>> www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Chethana Kumar
>>>>>>> Principal UI/UX Designer
>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Postgres Database Company
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> P: +91 86981 57146 <+91%2086981%2057146>
>>>>>>> www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Chethana Kumar
>>>>>> Principal UI/UX Designer
>>>>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Postgres Database Company
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P: +91 86981 57146 <+91%2086981%2057146>
>>>>>> www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>
>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Assumptions validated by consistent data from actual experiments enable
>>>> the creation of real value.
>>>>
>>>> Sheldon E. Strauch
>>>> *Data Architect, Data Services *
>>>> *O* 312-676-1556 <(312)%20676-1556>
>>>> *M* 224-723-3878 <(224)%20723-3878>
>>>>
>>>> *Enova International, Inc.*
>>>> *This transmission is confidential and may be privileged or
>>>> proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized
>>>> to use the information in this transmission in any way. Please inform the
>>>> sender immediately if you have received this transmission in error and
>>>> permanently delete and destroy the original and any copies of the
>>>> information.*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Page
>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>
>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chethana Kumar
>> Principal UI/UX Designer
>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>
>>
>> The Postgres Database Company
>>
>> P: +91 86981 57146 <+91%2086981%2057146>
>> www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
--
Chethana Kumar
Principal UI/UX Designer
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
P: +91 86981 57146
www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
TreeUpdated.png | image/png | 107.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2017-07-03 14:40:40 | Re: Tree view icon samples |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2017-07-03 14:22:37 | Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: Fixed the issue related to Domain Constraint module |