Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs
Date: 2018-08-14 20:43:07
Message-ID: CAH2-WznziXtsEkzWQUzn8RbASTbsLg7zz9FUNuXftCqD582mOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> We're kinda stuck with that. We could add FUNCTION as a preferred
> synonym, perhaps, but I doubt that'd really be worth the trouble.

Seems sufficient to note in the relevant docs that it's a legacy thing.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2018-08-14 20:44:16 Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results into variables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-08-14 20:42:43 Re: Facility for detecting insecure object naming