Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs
Date: 2018-08-14 20:39:09
Message-ID: 14867.1534279149@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> What should we do with the use of the keyword PROCEDURE in the CREATE
> OPERATOR and CREATE TRIGGER syntaxes?

We're kinda stuck with that. We could add FUNCTION as a preferred
synonym, perhaps, but I doubt that'd really be worth the trouble.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-08-14 20:42:43 Re: Facility for detecting insecure object naming
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-08-14 20:23:33 Re: Facility for detecting insecure object naming