From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Костя Кузнецов <chapaev28(at)ya(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: GiST VACUUM |
Date: | 2019-07-24 18:02:13 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-WznOjh1nYz_grTYGR91ALA3qMd+nWN+0F=N3n8NecLvi6w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:30 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> Pushed this now, to master and REL_12_STABLE.
>
> Now, B-tree indexes still have the same problem, in all versions. Any
> volunteers to write a similar fix for B-trees?
I was hoping that you'd work on it. :-)
Any reason to think that it's much different to what you've done with GiST?
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2019-07-24 18:32:58 | Re: GiST VACUUM |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-07-24 17:49:00 | Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction |