Re: GiST VACUUM

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Костя Кузнецов <chapaev28(at)ya(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: GiST VACUUM
Date: 2019-07-24 18:32:58
Message-ID: 135dfb36-e1d5-fd93-83b0-43c0b6ecf290@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24/07/2019 21:02, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:30 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> Pushed this now, to master and REL_12_STABLE.
>>
>> Now, B-tree indexes still have the same problem, in all versions. Any
>> volunteers to write a similar fix for B-trees?
>
> I was hoping that you'd work on it. :-)

That's probably how it's going to go, but hey, doesn't hurt to ask :-).

> Any reason to think that it's much different to what you've done with GiST?

No, it should be very similar.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-07-24 18:41:13 Re: GiST VACUUM
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-07-24 18:02:13 Re: GiST VACUUM