Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?

From:	Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To:	Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc:	Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?
Date:	2020-05-09 04:21:25
Message-ID:	CAH2-Wzn9TFC==XXYk=pE2Pm9OjbZcNihez577kZreEOuiExiOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2020-05-07 03:03:04 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>  2020-05-07 04:18:35 from vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>   2020-05-07 04:49:45 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>    2020-05-07 07:57:00 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>     2020-05-07 11:33:27 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> 📎      2020-05-07 16:18:52 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>       2020-05-09 04:17:48 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>        2020-05-09 04:21:25 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>         2020-05-10 02:00:36 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed? at 2020-05-09 04:17:48 from Michael Paquier

Responses

• Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed? at 2020-05-10 02:00:36 from Michael Paquier

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Tom Lane	2020-05-09 04:45:11	Re: [PATCH] Fix division by zero (explain.c)
Previous Message	Michael Paquier	2020-05-09 04:17:48	Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?