Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?
Date: 2020-05-09 04:17:48
Message-ID: 20200509041748.GI11539@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:18:52AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 4:33 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> So this gives the attached. Any thoughts?
>
> That seems fine.

Thanks for the review. If there are no objections, I would like to
apply that by tomorrow. So please let me know.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-05-09 04:21:25 Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-05-09 03:26:22 Re: Back-patch is necessary? Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI.