| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |
| Date: | 2019-05-16 19:35:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzkkJWHiY-Uqmd4L2L5YKiPDW02ach478KXb12gmFcQGtg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:08 PM Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't understand why you want to make things such black boxes. It is
> what it is, and some users (not all) will want to understand. People
> who have already tested pg11 and found it insufficient may give pg12 a
> second look if we tell them we have fixed the deficiencies they found.
+1. The major features list should be accessible, but otherwise I
think that we should add more detail.
80% - 90% of the items listed in the release notes aren't interesting
to users, but *which* 80% - 90% it is varies. The release notes don't
have to function as a press release, because we'll have an actual
press release instead.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-05-16 23:52:50 | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |
| Previous Message | Stephen Amell | 2019-05-16 19:18:42 | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-05-16 20:05:36 | Re: VACUUM can finish an interrupted nbtree page split -- is that okay? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-05-16 19:29:36 | Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value |