| From: | Stephen Amell <mrstephenamell(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |
| Date: | 2019-05-16 19:18:42 |
| Message-ID: | 5e28ae21-34df-eb6b-b02f-e5e3bdaf3df5@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-05-16 16:08, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-May-16, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> I think the more specific we make the partition description, the more
>> limited it will appear to be. I think almost all partition operations
>> will appear to be faster with PG 12, even if users can't articulate
>> exactly why.
> I don't understand why you want to make things such black boxes. It is
> what it is, and some users (not all) will want to understand. People
> who have already tested pg11 and found it insufficient may give pg12 a
> second look if we tell them we have fixed the deficiencies they found.
yep, I agree with Alvaro, I'm one of these users...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-05-16 19:35:25 | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-05-16 19:08:06 | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-05-16 19:29:36 | Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-05-16 19:08:06 | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |