Re: small development tip: Consider using the gold linker

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: small development tip: Consider using the gold linker
Date: 2022-02-23 02:16:54
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkU_DTB8B=Tr6o+y0wbgmJeTG=mEXnRPWcYTnWvCoMMtg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 4:26 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I've switched back and forth between gold and lld a couple times. Eventually I
> always get frustrated by lld causing slowdowns and other issues for gdb. Did
> you ever hit one of those?

Now that you mention it...gdb was very slow the last few times I used
it, which wasn't for long enough for it to really matter. This must
have been why. I might have to rescind my recommendation of lld.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-02-23 02:25:04 Re: Use generation context to speed up tuplesorts
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-02-23 02:14:15 Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats