From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats |
Date: | 2022-02-23 02:14:15 |
Message-ID: | 20220223021415.ynybxeroefw4kiwh@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-02-22 14:45:19 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I've attached a patch that changes pg_stat_subscription_workers view.
Thanks for working on this!
Why are the stats stored in the per-database stats file / as a second level
below the database? While they're also associated with a database, it's a
global catalog, so it seems to make more sense to have them "live" globally as
well?
Not just from an aesthetical perspective, but there might also be cases where
it's useful to send stats from the stats launcher. E.g. the number of times
the launcher couldn't start a worker because the max numbers of workers was
already active or such.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-02-23 02:16:54 | Re: small development tip: Consider using the gold linker |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-02-23 02:06:28 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |