Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Cc: Masahiro(dot)Ikeda(at)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Masao(dot)Fujii(at)nttdata(dot)com
Subject: Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree
Date: 2024-09-20 18:06:41
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkO1o37W9=YZzx2x3SQ0=xVSJ_HW3vuo0Zzoiz+DV6wUw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 10:59 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 10:07 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> wrote:
> > Yes, I think backpatching to 17 would be fine. I'd be worried about
> > maybe disrupting some monitoring in production systems, but for 17 that
> > shouldn't be a problem yet. So fine with me.
>
> I'll commit minimal changes to _bt_first that at least make the
> counters consistent, then. I'll do so soon.

Pushed, thanks

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2024-09-20 18:11:22 Re: Why mention to Oracle ?
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2024-09-20 18:00:32 Re: Why mention to Oracle ?