From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations |
Date: | 2021-10-13 21:09:48 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=gNyNoj2BBSjf8qC=w5tTnthfuXWn96oh3rrZWd6YQkQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 7:22 PM Mark Dilger
<mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree that it is unlikely to make much difference in practice.
> I don't feel strongly about this. If you'd like me to remove those checks, I can do so. These are just my thoughts on the subject.
Okay. I don't feel strongly about it either.
I just pushed v4, with the additional minor pg_amcheck documentation
updates we talked about. No other changes.
Thanks again
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-10-13 22:58:10 | Re: BUG #17227: segmentation fault with jsonb_to_recordset |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-10-13 20:54:52 | Re: BUG #17227: segmentation fault with jsonb_to_recordset |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-10-13 21:15:17 | Re: prevent immature WAL streaming |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-10-13 20:46:53 | Re: prevent immature WAL streaming |