Re: prevent immature WAL streaming

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com" <mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, "Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com" <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>, Ryo Matsumura <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: prevent immature WAL streaming
Date: 2021-10-13 20:46:53
Message-ID: 202110132046.mqsx3t6jdpgh@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

On 2021-Oct-13, Andres Freund wrote:

> Something very roughly like the attached. Perhaps that's going a bit overboard
> though. But it seems like it might be something we could use in a few tests?

Hah, our emails crossed. If you want to turn this into a patch to the
026 test file, please go ahead. Failing that, I'd just push the patch I
just sent in my other reply.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"You're _really_ hosed if the person doing the hiring doesn't understand
relational systems: you end up with a whole raft of programmers, none of
whom has had a Date with the clue stick." (Andrew Sullivan)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-10-13 21:09:48 Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2021-10-13 20:43:53 Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname