Re: Harmonizing pg_bsd_indent parameter names

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Harmonizing pg_bsd_indent parameter names
Date: 2024-06-13 02:04:04
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=XRCxfx5yYzP3j069=2G5vRx+0S0ByV=_g65Bd-i=gXA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 9:58 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> We could probably assume that we'll treat their code as though
> HAVE_POSIX_DECLS is true and so this whole stanza goes away.
> But I'd just as soon not think about it until I have the energy
> to do that sync. Unless somebody else is hot to do it (if so,
> see the notes at src/timezone/README), let's leave this be
> for now.

Understood. Thanks.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2024-06-13 03:09:37 Re: Addressing SECURITY DEFINER Function Vulnerabilities in PostgreSQL Extensions
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-06-13 02:00:41 Re: Changing default -march landscape