| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck |
| Date: | 2019-07-09 00:33:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=36A7KmVv6SDh7m7qZpAjzuk6vbx2EwpcZH0mrT+etZg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 7:53 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:58 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> > I will think about a simple fix, but after the upcoming point release.
> > There is no hurry.
>
> A bureaucratic question: What should the status be for this CF entry?
I have plans to use RelationGetNumberOfBlocks() to size amcheck's
downlink Bloom filter. I think that that will solve the problems with
unreliable estimates of index size. which seemed to be the basis of
Alexander's complaint.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-07-09 01:29:17 | Re: [PATCH v4] Add \warn to psql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-07-09 00:15:02 | Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb |