Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date: 2020-09-15 22:27:21
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=2GDms4mBm2JxM8ysC9fmNCBGxLKAGK0a+JoOtUvKASA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The tag is applied, though for some reason the pgsql-committers auto
> e-mail about new tags hasn't been working lately.

Thanks. FWIW I did get the automated email shortly after you sent this email.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2020-09-15 22:48:32 Re: DROP relation IF EXISTS Docs and Tests - Bug Fix
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-15 22:02:21 Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers