Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date: 2020-09-15 23:00:37
Message-ID: 1414831.1600210837@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The tag is applied, though for some reason the pgsql-committers auto
>> e-mail about new tags hasn't been working lately.

> Thanks. FWIW I did get the automated email shortly after you sent this email.

Yeah, it did show up here too, about an hour after I pushed the tag.
The last several taggings have been delayed similarly, and I think
at least one never was reported at all.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-09-16 00:10:27 Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2020-09-15 22:48:32 Re: DROP relation IF EXISTS Docs and Tests - Bug Fix